THM Revenue Intelligence · Deep Research · Vintage Park

HOUZN vs HOUZV: the gap is real, but the cause is not what it looked like

A full triangulation across nine data points: STR actuals, 168 rate-variance reports, 57 of HOUZN's own Top 30 account reports, both hotels' revenue-strategy packets, the city ledger, and public account research. The headline reverses the obvious story.

Prepared for Ace2026-05-20Private, do not share

Bottom line

HOUZN trails HOUZV by +27% on RevPAR (73.71 vs 93.83 in 2025), behind on both occupancy (65.3% vs 79.8%) and realized ADR ($112.56 vs $121.20). That part held up under the deep dig (source: data.json, HOUZN STR + HOUZV flash actuals).

What reversed: HOUZN is not under-pricing. It posts higher rates than HOUZV on 78 to 83% of forward nights, by $8 to $12 (source: houzn_smart_findings.md). It loses the money downstream, through a growing fixed-discount block, a collapsed group book backfilled cheap, low-rate contractor crews, and no premium tier. HOUZV wins by holding floors and filling late at rate on a clean transient base, not by selling higher. The fix is mix and discipline, not the rate card.

1Head to head, every month of 2025

RevPAR is occupancy times ADR. HOUZV beat HOUZN all 12 months. Both beat the weak end of the comp set, but HOUZN sits mid-pack while HOUZV leads it (source: data.json; HOUZV STAR rank 2 of 7).

+27%
2025 RevPAR gap
$74 vs $94
14 pts
Occupancy gap
65.3% vs 79.8%
$9
Realized ADR gap
$113 vs $121
+$8 to $12
HOUZN posted-rate LEAD
on 78-83% of nights
MonthHOUZN occHOUZV occHOUZN ADRHOUZV ADRHOUZN RevPARHOUZV RevPARGap
Jan54%67%$103$115$56$78+40%
Feb76%86%$116$124$88$107+21%
Mar76%84%$110$124$83$105+26%
Apr73%78%$112$122$82$96+17%
May66%83%$115$123$75$102+36%
Jun68%87%$113$121$76$105+38%
Jul68%77%$118$120$80$93+16%
Aug49%89%$110$114$53$84+58%
Sep62%68%$111$118$69$94+37%
Oct73%82%$119$124$86$91+5%
Nov65%84%$113$125$73$82+12%
Dec56%70%$112$124$63$90+44%
2025 avg65%80%$113$121$74$94+27%

HOUZN's rank in its own 9-hotel comp set, 2025

The same report type as HOUZV's Rank of 7. Lower is better; green is top of the set. HOUZV sits inside this same 9-hotel set and ranks above HOUZN (source: HOUZN_STR_2025-12.xlsx, Comp tab).

Rank of 9JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Occupancy445324434243
ADR875443545434
RevPAR664443533233
HOUZN settles around 3rd of 9 on RevPAR through the back half of 2025, with ADR its weakest rank early in the year. HOUZV ranks about 2 of 7 in its smaller set. The two comp sets overlap and each contains the other, so the cleanest read is simple: in HOUZN's own set, the Hyatt outranks our SpringHill, it does not lead the market.

2The data dossier: what each source proves

You asked which data points actually help triangulate. Here is the case for each, what it can prove, and the key finding. The three marked "spine" carry the diagnosis; the rest corroborate or add the names.

Data pointSourceWhat it triangulatesKey finding
HOUZN monthly STR + HOUZV month-end Flashdata.json (12 mo 2025 + 16 flash)Realized occupancy, ADR, RevPAR for both, apples to applesTHE GAP. HOUZN $73.71 RevPAR vs HOUZV $93.83 (+27%), behind on both levers, every month
HOUZN SMART Comp Shopshouzn_smart_findings.md (3 packets)HOUZN posted rate vs HOUZV posted rate, forwardHOUZN posts HIGHER than HOUZV by $8 to $12 on 78 to 83% of nights. The loss is realized-rate leakage, not weak pricing
HOUZV Strategy Recaps, 12M tabhouzv_segment_trends.md (8 monthly)HOUZV true segment mix by official taxonomyNear-pure transient, 78 to 89%. Retail ~918 rn/mo at $148 is the rate engine; group thin (11 to 22%); contract negligible
HOUZV Recap notes + RS+D360houzv_segment_trends.md, houzv_booking_window_pace.md (19 recaps)Doctrine, rate floors, booking pace, events, named groupsHolds floors ($134/$139/$200/$219), fills LATE at rate (34 to 38% at 30 days out, finishes 71 to 77%). Named SMERF/sports groups + FIFA codified
HOUZV Rate Variance corpushouzv_ratevar_findings.md (168 reports, 24,835 stays)Guest names banked to rate codes; repeat travelers, long-stays, group blocksMember+RACK is ~43% of nights (the ceiling). Repeat guests + crews + G-EAT/RACKX2 blocks exist but are a small share (daily snapshots over-weight long stays)
HOUZV city ledger / ARhouzv_accounts.md (21 NA + 4 journals)Named corporate direct-bill accountsNONE. Loyalty/award dominated; one stale insurance account (Alacrity). HOUZV is not corporate-account driven
HOUZN Top 30 Reportshouzn_top30.md (57 reports)HOUZN's own named accounts and groupsWHERE THEY WORK. Energy + industrial contractor crews (Oceaneering, INNIO, Osmose, Everline, Arcxis...) at low ADR; episodic sports/wedding groups
HOUZN SMART segment + Confidentialhouzn_smart_findings.mdHOUZN forward mix; Marriott rate-share opt-in statusFixed Discounts +150 rooms YoY (the leak); Special Corporate -40 and Government -48 YoY (premium shrinking). Confidential tabs BLANK: not opted into rate-sharing
Account web researchaccount_intel.md (28 orgs)Sector and NW-Houston nexus of each named accountTwo target HQs in HOUZN's own zip 77070 (Arcxis, Venterra). CLC Lodging is the biggest re-rate lever. Submarket = energy/industrial weekday + youth-sports weekend
The biggest single insight came from crossing two of these: HOUZN's posted rates (SMART Comp Shops) are higher than HOUZV's, yet HOUZN's realized ADR (STR) is lower. No single report shows that. The gap between the two is the entire diagnosis.

3Why HOUZV wins, and why HOUZN cannot just copy it

Most of the gap is occupancy, not rate. HOUZV sells about 104 rooms a night against HOUZN's 91, roughly 13 more rooms every night with 9 fewer rooms to sell (data.json). The mix below is in room nights per month, each hotel in its own chain's segment categories. Read it down the columns: HOUZV out-produces HOUZN in retail, group, and especially loyalty, while HOUZN's corporate is split across Special Corporate and the BAR-tied bucket rather than missing.

104
HOUZV rooms sold / night
79.8% of 130 rooms
91
HOUZN rooms sold / night
65.3% of 139 rooms
+13
HOUZV advantage / night
with 9 fewer rooms
290 vs 130
loyalty rn/mo (HOUZV vs HOUZN)
and $65 vs $0 ADR

HOUZV room nights / month (Hyatt)

Retailrate engine
918 rn/mo$148 ADR
Negotiated (LRA + NLRA)corporate
315 rn/mo$120 ADR
Discount
1,002 rn/mo$110 ADR
Group
415 rn/mo$118 ADR
Loyalty redemption
290 rn/mo$65 ADR
QualifiedAAA, gov, mil
173 rn/mo$133 ADR
Monthly room nights by Hyatt segment (recap 12M average, houzv_segment_trends.md). Negotiated is the full corporate book, last-room-availability plus non-LRA.

HOUZN room nights / month (SpringHill)

RetailStandard + Premium
867 rn/mo$126 ADR
Special Corporate (LRA)named corporate
103 rn/mo$112 ADR
Retail-Tied DiscountsBAR-linked, incl dynamic corporate
499 rn/mo$118 ADR
Fixed Discountspromo, OTA, advance
651 rn/mo$117 ADR
Group
359 rn/mo$115 ADR
Reward Redemptionloyalty
130 rn/moposts ~$0
Policy + Government
151 rn/mo$126 ADR
Monthly room nights by Marriott segment (segment share from SMART Future Segmentation x HOUZN's ~2,760 room nights a month at 2025 occupancy, plus group). Corporate reading: the explicit Special Corporate (LRA) line is small (103), but HOUZN's dynamic corporate sits inside Retail-Tied Discounts (499), so its true corporate book is roughly comparable to HOUZV's 315, not a quarter of it. Loyalty (Reward Redemption) posts at $0 room revenue (Daily Seg code 25MRY) versus HOUZV's $65.

The structural reason HOUZN cannot just hold rate

HOUZV is the only Hyatt within roughly a 10 mile radius (the nearest other Hyatt Place is the Cy-Fair property out on US-290). A World of Hyatt member in Vintage Park has no other Hyatt to choose, so HOUZV is the captive Hyatt and it can hold rate while occupancy sticks. HOUZN sits in the opposite position: it is one of about five Marriott-brand hotels inside a one mile radius (Courtyard, Residence Inn, Element, TownePlace, plus SpringHill itself). A Bonvoy member shops across all of them, so if HOUZN holds rate while a sister Marriott does not, it loses the room to the sister Marriott, not to the Hyatt. That is the real reason HOUZN leans on discount and group to fill, and why "hold rate like HOUZV" is the wrong prescription.

HOUZN's realistic levers are mix and product, not naked rate: grow the member and retail share where its ADR already matches HOUZV, trim the deepest discount and the CLC drag where it does not cost occupancy, build a premium and suite tier the neighboring select-service Marriotts may not have, own the extended-stay crew demand at direct rates, and apply rate discipline selectively on compression and event dates where demand is captive, not across the board.

HOUZV's doctrine, for reference (source: strategy_compare.md)

"Focus on growing retail to strengthen our overall ADR."HOUZV recap, 2026-05-07
  • Holds floors: $134 midweek, $139 weekend, $200 suite, $219 ceiling
  • Fills late at rate: 34 to 38% on the books at 30 days out, finishes 71 to 77% (houzv_booking_window_pace.md)
  • One targeted promo (3-night HTB), not structural discounting; protects group with cutoff-wash discipline
  • No corporate ledger: demand runs on captive loyalty and leisure (houzv_accounts.md)

4Why HOUZN leaks (the five gaps)

HOUZN is professionally managed (Marriott RMAS, weekly call, real rate floors, working FIFA). The gap is execution emphasis, sourced to strategy_compare.md and houzn_smart_findings.md.

GAP 1

No premium tier

HOUZV defends a $200 suite floor and $219 ceiling. HOUZN's ladder tops at ~$139 transient, $169 to $199 only on event dates. The top of the rate ladder is unbuilt.

GAP 2

Discount-mix leakage

Posts high, realizes low. A growing Fixed-Discount block (+150 rooms YoY) plus Bonvoy ($39), Explore/MEO ($60) and wholesale ($97) drag blended ADR below HOUZV's.

GAP 3

Group collapse

Group on the books down 299 rooms YoY, refilled at $102 to $122 plus CLC crews at ~$65 to $70. HOUZV holds group ADR with wash discipline.

GAP 4

FIFA lag

HOUZV's World Cup monetization is codified (CXL policy, sports-group quote rule). HOUZN was still base-building and validating must-stay hurdles after an April PMS cutover.

GAP 5

Intel + staffing

HOUZV runs a multi-person command center with D360. HOUZN runs one RMAS advisor, the SMART Confidential rate-share tabs are blank (not opted in), through a mid-cycle PMS migration.

NET

The realized-ADR bridge

HOUZN posts $8 to $12 above HOUZV but realizes $9 below. That spread is gaps 1 to 3. Close them and HOUZN's rate-card lead converts to real RevPAR.

5Where the travelers actually work

From 57 of HOUZN's own Top 30 account reports (Feb to Apr 2026) plus public research (houzn_top30.md, account_intel.md). NW Houston / 77070 is the metro's energy and industrial-build weekday corridor, wrapped in a youth-sports and SMERF weekend layer. HOUZN already HAS this base; it is under-rating it.

HOUZN's demand base (existing accounts)

  • Energy Oceaneering, ARM Energy, INNIO (Waukesha), NCS Multistage, Pure Energy, RNWBL (renewables)
  • Utility / infra Osmose Utilities (via CLC, ~$65-70/night), Pantex crews
  • Industrial / contractor Everline Coatings, Mycon, Cintas, Snap-On, Serta Simmons, Arcxis
  • Tech / pro / insurance Jack Henry, K&L Gates, SageSure, Venterra (multifamily)
  • Groups NCA All-Star Nationals (~$104K), Bakersfield Bulldogs, ZT Prospects, Temple/LeBlanc/Porche/Tamayo weddings
Most of this base books at low long-stay or discount rates. The opportunity is to RE-RATE the existing volume, not to find new demand.

Submarket demand-driver map

  • Weekday engine: energy services + midstream/pipeline build + utility/industrial crews staging from NW Houston offices (several within minutes of 77070)
  • Two target HQs in HOUZN's own zip: Arcxis (19450 SH-249) and Venterra (20333 Hwy 249)
  • Weekend layer: youth sports (soccer, cheer, baseball) and SMERF (schools, churches, weddings)
  • Event spikes: Houston Rodeo, and FIFA World Cup 2026 (Houston is a host city, matches Jun to Jul)
  • CAT / insurance: displacement and restoration crews after storms (Alacrity model)

6Business mix, side by side

Rate codes banked against the rooms using them, grouped into families. HOUZV from 168 rate-variance reports (24,835 stays, houzv_ratevar_findings.md); HOUZN from its own 57 rate-variance reports (2,770 rows, houzn_guest_master.csv). Both are rate-variance rosters, so read shares as mix shape. Families are interpretive groupings by code structure.

HOUZV mix (Hyatt Place)

Member (WoH)
21.9%$143 ADR
RACK / BAR
21.4%$145 ADR
Group
12.8%$118 ADR
Loyalty redemption
10.3%$67 ADR
Negotiated / extended
7.2%$134 ADR
The volume leaders are also the highest-rate codes: Member and RACK at $143 to $145 make up about 43% of nights. That is a built-in rate engine.

HOUZN mix (SpringHill)

Other (long tail)
23.6%$116 ADR
Rate-managed
18.2%$134 ADR
Advance purchase
17.7%$125 ADR
Retail / BAR
13.2%$111 ADR
Bonvoy / redemption
11.2%$117 ADR
CLC / long-stay crew
5.6%$70 ADR
Corporate / negotiated
5.2%$137 ADR
Promo / package
3.1%$89 ADR
Volume leaders are mid-rate managed and advance-purchase. Corporate/negotiated is only ~5%, there is a CLC/long-stay crew block down at $70, and no member-rate engine like HOUZV's.

The CLC / crew channel: HOUZV takes none, HOUZN leans on it

HOUZV books zero CLC across 24,835 stays. HOUZN runs CLC as a standing block: CLC and Osmose-CLC appear in 41 of 57 rate-variance and 39 of 57 Top 30 reports at $65 to $72 a night, with one Osmose-CLC block reaching ~111 room-nights in a single month at $68 (houzn_top30.md, houzn_data/). HOUZV proves the same crew demand pays $116 to $119 through direct contracts (RACKX2, G-EAT).

Can HOUZN just raise the CLC rate 50%? No, and the earlier $42K projection is withdrawn. CLC/Corpay leverages 20M-plus room-nights a year to lock deep network rates, and crews travel on a fixed per-diem Trip Card; price above the per-diem and the account routes the crew to another hotel (corpaylodging.com). The realistic plan is mix and channel, not a unit-rate hike:

  • Displace, do not dump. Put minimum-length-of-stay, closed-to-arrival, and hurdle-rate controls on high-demand and event dates so $68 crew rooms stop crowding out $150 retail. Keep CLC on soft and shoulder nights where it is pure incremental occupancy (mylighthouse.com).
  • Step rate at renewal. Take single-digit increases tied to occupancy and market at the annual contract renewal, the normal negotiated-rate mechanism, not a one-time jump (thynk.cloud LNR guide).
  • Migrate up-channel. Pursue the same crews via direct negotiated and project accounts the way HOUZV does at $116 to $119, especially project-based construction crews, instead of the CLC commodity network (corpaylodging.com project programs).

Net: protect peak inventory now with displacement controls, and move crew demand off the lowest-rate channel over time. The dollar prize is real but it comes from mix and channel discipline, not from re-pricing a per-diem account that would simply leave.

7Concrete targets and the plan

Two moves: re-rate the base HOUZN already has, and solicit the groups HOUZV already wins. Sourced to account_intel.md; verify booking entities flagged below before acting.

TierTargetWhat they areNW Houston nexusMove
RE-RATEArcxisResidential inspection / engineeringHQ 19450 SH-249 Ste 300, 77070 (HOUZN's zip)Re-rate: convert from long-stay rate to a managed corporate BAR LNR
RE-RATEVenterra RealtyMultifamily owner / operatorOffice 20333 Hwy 249 Ste 650, 77070; $50M Cypress build underwayGrow: HQ travel + construction overflow, negotiated account
RE-RATECLC Lodging / CorpayCrew-lodging broker (16.7M room nights/yr)Channel routing Osmose and other crews at deep discountRe-rate the ceiling: audit HOUZN crew nights via CLC, renegotiate up
GROWINNIO WaukeshaGas-compression engines, ~9,000 to serviceNA office 8860 Fallbrook Dr, 77064Re-rate rotating field-service tech crews to a fair LNR
GROWOceaneering IntlOffshore energy servicesHQ NW Sam Houston Pkwy W (minutes from 77070)Grow: HQ visitors/vendors, negotiated BAR LNR
GROWOsmose UtilitiesUtility pole inspection crewsMobile crews on CenterPoint / co-op linesRe-rate recurring long-stay crew off legacy low rate
GROWARM EnergyMidstream / pipelineWaller County (US-290 zone) build-outGrow: tie rate to pipeline construction calendar
SOLICITAlbion Hurricanes FCYouth soccer, 5,000+ players, Cypress campusSolicit recurring weekend tournament blocks
SOLICITNCA All-Star NationalsCheer, locked 3-yr Houston contract 2026-28, ~45k spectatorsPre-sell NW overflow blocks at event-premium rate
SOLICITGYC PlannersHouston tournament-housing broker (channel)Get on their preferred-hotel list to win youth-sports volume
SOLICITAlacrity SolutionsInsurance restoration (ALE + CAT crews)Get on their managed-housing vendor list
SOLICITHOUZV SMERF bookConcordia Lutheran, Lamb of God, weddingsSolicit the local school/church/wedding blocks HOUZV already wins

The single biggest lever: the CLC ceiling

HOUZN's industrial crews (Osmose and others) route through CLC Lodging at roughly $65 to $70 a night. CLC moves 16.7M room-nights a year, so the rate is negotiable as a ceiling, not a fixed floor. Auditing how many HOUZN nights flow through CLC and renegotiating that ceiling up is likely the fastest realized-ADR win available.

DO 1

Build the premium tier

Add an everyday suite floor and ceiling so high-demand nights have somewhere to go above $139.

DO 2

Cut the fixed-discount block

Roll back the +150-room fixed-discount growth; convert volume to BAR and negotiated where demand allows.

DO 3

Rebuild the group book

Win back the 299 lost rooms with disciplined ADR; chase AHFC, NCA overflow, and HOUZV's SMERF book via GYC.

DO 4

Re-rate the energy/crew base

Arcxis and Venterra (both in 77070), INNIO, Oceaneering, and the CLC ceiling. Move legacy crew rates toward market.

DO 5

Codify FIFA now

Adopt HOUZV's CXL policy and sports-group quote rule before the summer window closes.

DO 6

Opt into rate-sharing

Turn on Marriott rate-share so the SMART Confidential tabs populate and HOUZN gains negotiated-rate visibility.

Method. Five parallel research agents mined nine data points, each making the case for its triangulation value, then cross-checked against the realized STR head-to-head. Files in the workspace: houzv_ratevar_findings.md (168 rate-variance reports, 24,835 guest-stays), houzv_accounts.md (city ledger, 21 NA + 4 journals), houzv_segment_trends.md / houzv_booking_window_pace.md / houzv_special_events.md / houzv_named_accounts.md (19 strategy recaps), houzn_top30.md (57 Top 30 reports), houzn_smart_findings.md and strategy_compare.md (HOUZN SMART packets + recaps), account_intel.md (28 organizations, public research), and data.json (HOUZN monthly STR + HOUZV month-end flash actuals).

Caveats to verify before acting. Pantex is in Amarillo (likely a traveling crew booking, not a local office). Dominion Energy has no confirmed NW Houston office; verify the booking entity. "Embassing Destiny," HOUZN's single largest producer by summed nights, is almost certainly a misparsed booking name (candidate: an "Embassy" / "Destiny" church); confirm in the PMS before treating it as a SMERF target. Crown of Life and Rockwall ISD are DFW (visiting-group demand, not local accounts). Rate-code family labels are interpretive. HOUZN night-audit feed captured covers Feb 22 to Apr 20 2026 only.

Generated 2026-05-20 for internal use. Not for distribution.